Amanda Ortega's essay (EDITING CHECKLIST)
ESSAY Peer Editing Checklist
Your Name: Uri
Gonzalez
Name of
Person You’re Evaluating: Amanda Ortega
Rate the
following areas from 1-5, I being “Poor” or “Missing” and 5 being “Excellent.”
If you give it a “3” or below, please offer your partner a suggestion for how
to improve. You may write on this sheet and/or on your partner’s story.
|
REQUIREMENTS |
RATING |
SUGGESTIONS |
|
Effective narrative hook
as first paragraph |
1 2 3 4 5 |
She
could give some data about the gap in employees’ skills to support her opening
paragraph and hooking the reader. |
|
Clearly and effectively
structured |
1 2 3 4 5 |
The
thesis statement is not clear, and in some cases, there is no connection between
ideas. |
|
Concluding sentence(s)
provide a sense of resolution |
1 2 3 4 5 |
The
last paragraph gives some solutions to the problem, but it must be more
detailed. |
|
Strong verbs and
adjectives |
1 2
3 4 5 |
|
|
Clear setting that
invokes a definite mood |
1 2
3 4 5 |
|
|
Clear point of view |
1 2
3 4 5 |
|
|
Ideas keep the reader
interested |
1 2 3 4 5 |
Again,
there is a lack of supporting data to make a more credible essay. |
|
The essay has purpose. |
1 2
3 4 5 |
|
|
Grammar & formatting
errors are not a distraction from overall effectiveness |
1 2 3 4 5 |
There
are some grammar errors which take the attention away, and confuses the
reader. |
What are the
strengths of this piece? Be clear and specific.
The draft is on a good path, it has a specific idea, and uses interesting concepts and but needs more data to support the ideas.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario